Finally, I received the requested information through
Freedom of Information Act/ Oregon Open Records Act


Included with the ink-mark covered sheets was a "cover letter" from Elizabeth Clark-Stern with the following statements:

Enclosed are documents pursuant to your request for information.There are a number of documents that have not been provided to you and of number of redactions that have been made to the enclosed documents because the information is exempt from disclosure.

Under ORS chapter 192, public records are available for public inspection unless there is an exemption. ORS 192.502(9) exempts from disclosure "public records or information the disclosure of which is prohibited or restricted or otherwise made confidential or privileged under Oregon law."

ORS 419A.255 prohibits providing you copies of any Juvenile Court documents. However, the statute allows a parent to inspect those documents. Therefore, SCF has not provided copies of any of those documents, however you, Ms. Henderson, may inspect these documents. (Note added-which I read means MR. Henderson cannot)

ORS 419B.035 prohibits the disclosure of any child abuse or neglect records or information compiled under ORS 419B.010 to 419B.050 unless certain exceptions apply. None of those exceptions apply in this case. Therefore, SCF has not provided you copies of any of those documents.

Finally, ORS 409.225(2)(e)(B) prohibits the disclosure of SCF records that pertain to a child who has been in the custody of SCF to the child's parent "If disclosure would be contrary to the best interests of any child***." SCF has not provided you with any information pertaining to Phillip Henderson because SCF has determined that disclosure to you, Ms. Henderson, would be contrary to the best interest of Phillip. SCF made this determination based on, among other things, your stated intent to disseminate it to the general public. Dissemination of private information about Phillip to the general public is contrary to Phillip's best interests.

Sincerely,

(Signed)

Elizabeth Clark-Stern
Branch Manager, Union/Wallowa

Well, I wonder if it would have helped if I had stated that I REALLY wanted the information for DISCOVERY of evidence to SUE THEM FOR $500,000,000 for deliberately destroying this kid.  No, probably wouldn't have helped at all.  The thing supposedly went to the Oregon State Attorney General's Office.  One may ask "Why?" while trying not to be paranoid.

As for the "information" I did receive, there appears to be ABSOLUTELY NOTHING useful for any purpose.  It appears they marked things out and THEN photo-copied those sheets to make sure I had no possible way to recover the hidden information.

A sample for comparison-

  Their REDACTED VERSION of my Grievance Letter of September 13, 1999

HIGHLIGHTED Version of the redacted information